Comments on: Spouses as sponsors in the RCIA process

By: Nick

Nick — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:03:54 +0000

Hi Celeste. Great insight! Thanks for sharing.

By: Celeste

Celeste — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:15:07 +0000

When I started working in RCIA 20 years ago I even allowed mother-in-laws to be sponsors. It doesn’t work! My experience over the years is that many young women who are about to get married to a Catholic are being pressured to hurry up and do this before the marriage. I don’t feel that the young woman can be truly free in her sharing about her unique spiritual journey. In fact, we have now made it a guideline that the sponsor not be any relative.
We are finding this works so much better.
Godparents can be relatives not not sponsors .

By: Nick

Nick — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:33:08 +0000

Thanks for letting us know how it works in your parish Karen.

By: Karen

Karen — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:57:15 +0000

I have a policy that anyone who has a spouse, fiance, or family member as sponsor also has a sponsor from the parish - so about 1/3 of my group at any given time has 2 sponsors. They are equal co-sponsors all the way through the process - they both participate in the rites, attend the sessions, and both are listed as sponsors in the records, etc. It works well. The few times that I have made exceptions to this, I have deeply regretted it. As another poster said, especially for young couples - they tend to keep to themselves and totally miss out on the community experience. It’s hard to get a good sense of where they are on their journey because they tend to not participate in discussions, either. I don’t exactly know why this happens, but I think it is because they are so “into” each other and their relationship that they don’t branch out. This is a good thing for Pre-Cana and their personal growth - but not a good thing for the RCIA process.

I do distinguish between sponsors and godparents, but 99% of the time, the sponsor ends up being the godparent. I distinguish it from the beginning so that there are no questions or hurt feelings if a catechumen chooses someone other than the sponsor to be his/her godparent.

By: Nick

Nick — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:46:26 +0000

That’s a clever idea Martin. What kind of training do you offer the spouse-sponsors as they companion the other person?

By: Martin

Martin — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:43:55 +0000

It has been my experience over the years to not have spouses as sponsors. I did find a good way to make that inquisitive spouse who wants to join her/his spouse. I have them come and sponsor another person. They do sit with the other person. Then driving home it gives them an opportunity to discuss what went on that evening. So far this has worked best for me. I also remind them that the sponsor represents the parish community, not the family.

By: Nick

Nick — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:59:17 +0000

Hi Jerry. Thanks for you thoughts. I tend to agree that having a spouse as a sponsor runs the risk of shortchanging the candidate.

By: Jerry Tidwell

Jerry Tidwell — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:29:31 +0000

My experience is that for young, newer relationship couples, it is a very bad idea. They are still getting to know each other, and there is risk the transformation conversion process can be compromised because of a reluctance by the candidate / catechumen to be totally open. The candidate is new in his relationship with their spouse and beginning a relationship with God! A sponsor is a companion and must be objective in listening to the genuine doubts, concerns of the candidate. In a young relationship it can be totally unfair and short change the candidates experience in the process to have a spouse as sponsor, in my view.

Now for long term marriages where they know each other very well, I’ve seen it to be a very beautiful and rewarding experience for the both of them. But I still believe even with the more mature relationships it should be considered on a case by case basis.