Why catechumens shouldn’t ask for faith
Posted by Nick
Thousands of parishes are getting ready to celebrate the Rite of Acceptance over the next several weeks. Catechumenate team leaders will gather with those who are to become catechumens and offer them a ritual catechesis something like this:
“And then Father will ask you your name. You tell him your name. And then Father will say, “˜What do you ask of God’s Church?’ and you say, “˜Faith.’ Then Father will say, “˜What does faith offer you,’ and you say, “˜Eternal life.’ Okay, let’s all try that together.”
If that’s roughly how your rehearsal goes, grab your copy of the RCIA, and let’s chat for a bit. Turn to paragraph 50 (which is on page 21 in my book, but might vary in yours). Then skip down to the long red paragraph that starts, “The celebrant continues with the following questions…” (top of page 22 in my book). Note the second sentence, which reads: “The celebrant may use other words than those provided in asking the candidates [for the Rite of Acceptance] about their intentions and may let them answer in their own words.”
Okay, this will be hard I know, but it’s important. Use other words than those provided. Why would you want to do that? Because this is real life. You want to catechize both the catechumens and the assembly that something powerful and important is taking place. The presider should ask a real question and expect to get a real answer.
Imagine for a moment you and I are in a small faith sharing group. I am really interested in you, and I want to know more about how you came to believe in Jesus. What kinds of questions would I ask? What kinds of answers should I expect? That is the dynamic that should be taking place in the Rite of Acceptance.
So the presider asks a real question. Something like: “John, what is it you are seeking?”
What does John say?
…If he doesn’t know what he is seeking, he is not yet ready to become a catechumen…
How should I know? I’m not John. I might be able guess what he might say, but even so, I shouldn’t be putting words in his mouth. John should answer honestly about what he is seeking. If he doesn’t know what he is seeking, he is not yet ready to become a catechumen.
John’s entire time in the inquiry period should have been focused on why he has come forward now, at this time. What is it he is seeking? What does he want? Who moves him and calls him? After weeks and months of struggling with questions like these, John will be more than ready to give a real answer when the question is put to him in the ritual. And the assembly will recognize it for what it is—a statement of faith.
It’s good to see you again. If you enjoyed this post, please share with a friend or colleague. Thanks for visiting!
Click here to:
Subscribe
Copyright © 2008, Team RCIA. All rights reserved.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 5th,
2007 at 2:55 pm
and is filed under Catechumens, Rite of Acceptance.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a
response, or trackback from your own site.











February 8th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
don’t you think that God might recognize and answer a person’s request for faith, be it ever so childlike, regardless of whether that person is in a state of total awareness (which we never are) about what he or she seeks?
August 17th, 2010 at 6:28 am
The biggest problem I’ve found with doing this at the Rite of Acceptance is that most people are kind of squeamish about saying anything in front of large audiences…much less something personal. To get up in front of 400 people that they don’t really know and talk into a microphone about the heartfelt reasons why they want to join the Catholic Church is terrifying! Most people have never even spoken into a microphone! When doing this, I have never found anyone that didn’t become a nervous wreck. Even a university professor that was used to speaking to large groups was shaking and her voice was cracking.
I agree that, in theory, this is a better thing to do. It gives more “soul” to the rite as opposed to the rote response, and it potentially gives more meaning to the participant, however, it’s just so painful for them that I’m not sure the benefits outweigh the costs. I will agree that it’s interesting to hear their different responses. They are sometimes very telling.
Do you have any suggestions? Are there ways to do this that won’t scare the pants off the participants?